This commitment encourages transparency in government procurement of goods/services (PBJ) including in emergency procurement, increases the participation of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises in government procurement of goods/services, and expands community involvement in monitoring the government procurement of goods/services.

What has been done so far to solve the problem?

In 2021, Central Information Commission Regulation No. 1 of 2021 concerning Public Information Service Standards (Perkislip1/2021) was issued which contains an article regulating the detailed explanation of PBJ information that must be opened by Public Bodies. In addition, the PBJ Openness Indicator has also been included as one of the indicators in the Public Information Disclosure Index (IKIP). In the electronic procurement system, LKPP has also published the Emergency PBJ dashboard in the Electronic Procurement Service (LPSE) channel.

What solution are you proposing?

This commitment will encourage Public Bodies related to Government PBJs to publish in more detail related to K/L/PD transactions including emergency procurement information, expand community participation in monitoring Government PBJs, improve the efficiency of complaint handling mechanism channels for Government PBJs, expand MSME involvement in Government PBJs, ensure the implementation of Perkislip 1/2021 in Government PBJs, and strengthen the community in involvement and supervision PBJ Government.

What results do you want to achieve by implementing this commitment?

Opening procurement information will provide space for the public to participate in monitoring and providing input to the government on the procurement process carried out. So far, one of the obstacles in the supervision of the Government's PBJ is the lack of detailed information that can be accessed through the procurement system, while requests for information sometimes take a long time. In addition, the opening of procurement information will also make it easier for business actors to be involved in the procurement market, which will also make it easier for business actors to get involved in the government procurement market which leads to a more competitive and efficient procurement process, as well as producing quality goods/services. Furthermore, governments, civil society organizations, academics, and journalists can also use the data for further analysis of the effectiveness and potential of fraud in the Government's PBJ.

Problem Definition

What problems does the commitment aim to address?

Every year the Central and Regional Governments allocate an abundant amount of Government Goods/Services Procurement (PBJ) budget, where in 2021 LKPP recorded PBJ spending reaching Rp1,214T or around 52.1% of the total Budget State Revenue and Expenditure (APBN). Covid-19 pandemic also give the conditions for the existence of special procurement in form of Emergency PBJ. Such a large budget allocation coupled with the existence of special procurement mechanism in form of Emergency PBJ could increase the potential corruption in Government PBJ.

The phenomenon of corruption in the Government's PBJ nationally is the second most corruption case handled by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). It was recorded from the year 2004 until July 2021 there are 240 corruption cases in the context of Government’s PBJ (KPK, 2022). Therefore, one way that can be done to prevent and reduce the potential for corruption in the context of PBJ is to open crucial procurement information so this will open up opportunities for the public to participate in supervising the PBJ process. On the other hand, this can form the better understanding of business actors to know the needs of the government and see the potential for involvement in PBJ so as to increase competition and healthier business competition in PBJ.

What are the causes of the problem?

The existing problems are caused by several things, namely, first, the lack of transparency of government procurement information, especially information that is important and can be used to confirm whether the allocated budget is appropriate or not. Although Indonesia has used electronic procurement, there is still a lot of procurement information that has not been published. Second, there are still Ministries/Institutions/Local Governments (K/L/PD) that consider procurement information to be excluded information or not public information. Third, low public participation to participate in monitoring the government procurement process. This is because the procurement process is complex, making it difficult for public to monitor. Therefore, if it’s needed to increase the role of community supervision in the context of the Government's PBJ, so it is also necessary to increase capacity for the public before conducting procurement monitoring.

Commitment Analysis

How will the commitment promote transparency?

The publication of Government PBJ information will increase public access to information that can be used to conduct studies, monitor, and participate in government procurement. This commitment is in line with the value of transparency described in Law No. 14 of 2008 concerning Public Information Disclosure, Perkislip 1/2021, and Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods and Services.

How will the commitment help foster accountability?

Publishing procurement information is a form of government accountability for the use of budgets that have been allocated and spent. With this information, the public can see, analyze, and know how the implementationof planning and absorption of the budget that has been allocated.

How will the commitment improve citizen participation in defining, implementing, and monitoring solutions?

This commitment will encourage wider participation for the public to participatein procurement, monitor procurement carried out, and use the data to encourage policy improvements in government procurement.

Lead Implementing Ministry / Agencies

1. Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (LKPP)
2. Komisi Informasi Pusat (KIP)

Lead Implementing Civil Society Organization

1. Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW
2. Transparency International Indonesia (TII)

Contact

sekretariat.ogi@bappenas.go.id
+6221-3148-551 ext. 3504

Ukuran Keberhasilan 2023-2024	Status	Evidence
(K/L) UK 1 : Publikasi transaksi Kementerian/Lembaga/ Pemerintah Daerah di ekatalog		Lihat
(OMS) UK 1 : Mendorong publikasi transaksi Kementerian/Lembaga/Pemerintah Daerah		Lihat
(K/L) UK 2 : Publikasi secara rinci informasi pengadaan darurat		Lihat
(OMS) UK 2 : Mendorong publikasi lebih rinci informasi pengadaan darurat		Lihat
(K/L) UK 3 : Mendorong efektivitas kanal e-pengaduan dalam menangani pengaduan masyarakat		Lihat
(OMS) UK 3 : Mendorong efektivitas kanal e-pengaduan dalam menangani pengaduan masyarakat		Lihat
(K/L) UK 4 : Pengembangan database Sistem Informasi Kinerja Penyedia (SIKAP) yang terintegrasi dan terbuka		Lihat
(OMS) UK 4 : Mendorong pengembangan database Sistem Informasi Kinerja Penyedia (SIKAP) yang terintegrasi dan terbuka		Lihat
(K/L) UK 5 : Publikasi informasi atau dokumen Pengadaan Barang/Jasa pemerintah yang diatur dalam Perki No. 1 Tahun 2021 di SPSE sesuai dengan kewenangan LKPP		Lihat
(OMS) UK 5 : Publikasi informasi atau dokumen Pengadaan Barang/Jasa pemerintah yang diatur dalam Perki No. 1 Tahun 2021 di SPSE sesuai dengan kewenangan LKPP		Lihat
(K/L) UK 6 : Penguatan masyarakat dalam keterlibatan dan pengawasan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah		Lihat
(OMS) UK 6 : Penguatan masyarakat dalam keterlibatan dan pengawasan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa		Lihat
(K/L) UK 7 : Implementasi informasi PBJ Pemerintah menurut Perki 1/2021		Lihat
(OMS) UK 7 : Mendorong implementasi informasi PBJ Pemerintah menurut Perki 1/2021		Lihat

Commitment Description